Peter Obi has urged authorities to free Nnamdi Kanu, arguing that keeping the IPOB leader in custody is unnecessary and that dialogue remains the best way to address agitation. Obi made the statement while addressing Nigerians during a recent engagement in Washington, D.C., where he spoke on national issues and the need for inclusive governance. […]
Peter Obi has urged authorities to free Nnamdi Kanu, arguing that keeping the IPOB leader in custody is unnecessary and that dialogue remains the best way to address agitation.
Obi made the statement while addressing Nigerians during a recent engagement in Washington, D.C., where he spoke on national issues and the need for inclusive governance.
A video from the event has attracted widespread attention online, with supporters sharing clips of his comments across various social media platforms.
During the discussion, Obi maintained that he has repeatedly expressed the view that Kanu should not remain in detention, regardless of differing political opinions.
He argued that individuals should not face prolonged incarceration simply because of statements made through media platforms or public commentary.
The former governor said criticism and verbal attacks are common experiences for politicians, noting that such actions should not automatically be regarded as criminal offences.
Obi also used the opportunity to advocate greater dialogue between government authorities and groups expressing grievances across the country.
According to him, meaningful engagement offers a better path toward resolving tensions and understanding the concerns driving various forms of agitation.
He stressed that leaders must be willing to listen, consult and seek peaceful solutions rather than rely solely on force or punitive measures.
Kanu remains in prison following his conviction by a Federal High Court in Abuja on terrorism related offences. However, the IPOB leader has appealed the judgment and is seeking to overturn both his conviction and sentence.
His lawyers continue to challenge the ruling, insisting that the legal process that led to the conviction was unfair.