A prominent commercial lawyer, Marshal Abubakar, has called for a formal apology, investigation, and possible prosecution of presidential media aide Bayo Onanuga over a controversial social media post involving social commentator Martins Vincent Otse. In a strongly worded statement, Abubakar said he was deeply concerned about the content and implications of the post shared on […]

A prominent commercial lawyer, Marshal Abubakar, has called for a formal apology, investigation, and possible prosecution of presidential media aide Bayo Onanuga over a controversial social media post involving social commentator Martins Vincent Otse.

In a strongly worded statement, Abubakar said he was deeply concerned about the content and implications of the post shared on May 27, 2026, alleging that it contained misleading information capable of undermining public trust in official communication.

The lawyer, known for his vocal stance on commercial and public interest matters, argued that the alleged conduct by a senior government spokesperson raises serious questions about accountability and responsible communication from public office holders.

He also referenced the media aide’s past as a pro-democracy journalist, noting what he described as a contradiction between earlier advocacy for press freedom and current actions within government.

Abubakar maintained that constitutional protections for free speech remain sacrosanct, stressing that citizens are entitled to criticise government policies without fear of intimidation or reprisal.

Citing judicial authorities such as IGP v. ANPP (2007) and Arthur Nwankwo v. The State (1985), he insisted that Nigerian courts have consistently upheld the principle that freedom of expression must not be unlawfully restricted.

He further urged the Presidency to publicly distance itself from the controversial post and take appropriate disciplinary measures where necessary to preserve institutional integrity.

The statement also suggested that the post may fall within provisions of Section 24 of the Cybercrimes Act, while referencing Section 26 relating to offensive or discriminatory communication.

Abubakar added that VDM retains the right to seek legal redress through civil proceedings, separate from any administrative or criminal action.

He concluded by stressing that accountability standards for public officials must remain consistent with democratic and constitutional expectations.